Cooling Time Calculator

Calculate optimal cooling time for injection molded parts based on material properties and wall thickness.

Process Parameters

Enter part and process specifications

Thickest section of the part

Select the polymer family for your part

Material temperature at injection

Part temperature at ejection

Temperature of the cooling medium

Cooling Analysis Results

Calculated cooling time and temperature sensitivity

Need equipment for your project? Visit Mammoth Hire for quality tool and equipment rental in the UK.

How the cooling time is calculated

The formula, inputs and assumptions behind the estimate above.

Formula

t = h² / (π² · α) × ln( (4 / π) × (Tmelt − Tcoolant) / (Teject − Tcoolant) )

This is the first term of the series solution for one-dimensional transient heat conduction in a flat plate. It gives the time for the hottest point, at the mid-plane of the thickest wall, to fall from the melt temperature to the ejection temperature while both mold faces are held at the coolant temperature. The 4 / π factor is the mid-plane coefficient of that first term. The calculator evaluates the expression exactly as written, with π² taken as 9.8696.

Variables and units

SymbolMeaningUnitSource in the calculator
tRequired cooling time for the wall mid-plane to reach the ejection temperaturesCalculated result, shown as Required Cooling Time
hMaximum wall thickness, the thickest section of the partmmMaximum Wall Thickness field (0.1 to 50 mm)
αThermal diffusivity of the selected polymer familymm²/sBuilt-in value for the selected Material (see below)
TmeltMaterial temperature at injection°CMelt Temperature field (150 to 400 °C)
TejectPart temperature at ejection, at the wall mid-plane°CEjection Temperature field (40 to 200 °C)
TcoolantTemperature of the cooling medium, taken as the mold wall temperature°CCoolant Temperature field (5 to 95 °C)

Built-in thermal diffusivity values (mm²/s)

The calculator uses one fixed value per polymer family. These are generic reference values, not grade-specific data.

  • ABS: 0.08
  • PP: 0.07
  • PE: 0.09
  • PS: 0.08
  • PC: 0.11
  • POM: 0.13
  • PA: 0.09
  • PBT: 0.10
  • PMMA: 0.10
  • PET: 0.09
  • PVC: 0.07
  • TPE: 0.05
  • TPU: 0.06

Worked example

Using the calculator defaults: ABS, h = 2.5 mm, melt 230 °C, ejection 80 °C, coolant 25 °C, with α = 0.08 mm²/s for ABS.

  • h² / (π² · α) = 6.25 / (9.8696 × 0.08) = 6.25 / 0.7896 = 7.92 s
  • Temperature ratio: (230 − 25) / (80 − 25) = 205 / 55 = 3.727
  • (4 / π) × 3.727 = 1.273 × 3.727 = 4.746, and ln(4.746) = 1.557
  • t = 7.92 × 1.557 = 12.3 s, which is the Required Cooling Time the calculator reports for these inputs

The Temperature Sensitivity chart repeats the same calculation for ejection temperatures from 20 °C below to 20 °C above the entered value in 5 °C steps. For this example it runs from 15.9 s at 60 °C to 9.9 s at 100 °C. Because t scales with h², increasing the wall to 3.0 mm raises the estimate to 17.8 s.

Assumptions and limitations

  • One-dimensional conduction through a flat wall cooled equally from both faces. Ribs, bosses, corners, cores and inserts are not modeled, and the thickest wall governs the whole part.
  • Thermal diffusivity is treated as constant from melt to ejection. Real values vary with temperature and grade, and the heat released on crystallization in semi-crystalline materials such as PP, PE, POM, PA, PBT and PET is not included.
  • The mold wall is assumed to sit at the coolant temperature with perfect thermal contact. The actual cavity surface temperature depends on channel layout, flow rate, mold material and cycle history.
  • The result covers the cooling phase only. Fill, pack and hold time, mold open time and ejection are not included.
  • The inputs must be ordered melt temperature above ejection temperature, and ejection temperature above coolant temperature. Outside that order the logarithm has no physical meaning.
  • Treat the output as a first-pass estimate for design reviews and budgetary quoting. It does not replace material supplier data or molding trials, which remain the basis for production cycle times.